All comparisons

Fidelity Low-Priced Stock vs FPA Crescent

Total-return comparison vs the S&P 500 and NASDAQ — growth of $10,000.

Growth of $10k · 20032026 · total return (div-adjusted)

$0$58k$117k$175k$234k20032006200920122015201820212024

Benchmarks

Accessible funds

Fund / indexVehicleSinceCAGR (full history)
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock$FLPSX200310.1%
FPA Crescent$FPACX20038.7%
S&P 500$SPY200310.7%
NASDAQ-100$QQQ200314.7%

Dividend/split-adjusted total return. Mutual funds use NAV, listed trusts use share price. Past performance does not predict future results. Not financial advice.

Frequently asked questions

Who performed better since 2003: Fidelity Low-Priced Stock or FPA Crescent?

Fidelity Low-Priced Stock leads with a 10.1% annualized return since 2003, vs 8.7% for FPA Crescent (total return, dividend-adjusted).

How much would $10,000 invested in Fidelity Low-Priced Stock in 2003 be worth?

$10,000 invested in Fidelity Low-Priced Stock (FLPSX) at the end of 2003 would be worth about $91.7k as of 2026, a 10.1% compound annual growth rate.

How much would $10,000 invested in FPA Crescent in 2003 be worth?

$10,000 invested in FPA Crescent (FPACX) at the end of 2003 would be worth about $67.8k as of 2026, a 8.7% compound annual growth rate.

Related comparisons