All comparisons

FPA Crescent vs Scottish Mortgage

Total-return comparison vs the S&P 500 and NASDAQ — growth of $10,000.

Growth of $10k · 20032026 · total return (div-adjusted)

$0$81k$162k$244k$325k20032006200920122015201820212024

Benchmarks

Accessible funds

Fund / indexVehicleSinceCAGR (full history)
FPA Crescent$FPACX20038.7%
Scottish Mortgage$SMT.L200316.3%
S&P 500$SPY200310.7%
NASDAQ-100$QQQ200314.7%

Dividend/split-adjusted total return. Mutual funds use NAV, listed trusts use share price. Past performance does not predict future results. Not financial advice.

Frequently asked questions

Who performed better since 2003: FPA Crescent or Scottish Mortgage?

Scottish Mortgage leads with a 16.3% annualized return since 2003, vs 8.7% for FPA Crescent (total return, dividend-adjusted).

How much would $10,000 invested in FPA Crescent in 2003 be worth?

$10,000 invested in FPA Crescent (FPACX) at the end of 2003 would be worth about $67.8k as of 2026, a 8.7% compound annual growth rate.

How much would $10,000 invested in Scottish Mortgage in 2003 be worth?

$10,000 invested in Scottish Mortgage (SMT.L) at the end of 2003 would be worth about $325k as of 2026, a 16.3% compound annual growth rate.

Related comparisons